The Virtual Bookcase Reviews of 'The Multiplex Man':
Reviewer Rob Slade wrote:
Having reviewed and enjoyed other books by Hogan (cf. BKBUGPRK.RVW and
BKIMMOPT.RVW) I was terribly disappointed by this one. Not that it is
really bad, as such: the story is a fairly average piece of science
fiction. It's just that Hogan can do so much better.
I am giving away nothing in saying that the Multiplex Man of the title
is a man of many parts, and only a little in stating that the parts
are multiple personalities. (The surprise twist ending, in fact, will
come as no surprise at all to anyone who has been paying attention
throughout the book.) The technology taken to accomplish the
multiplexing is standard fare, but, again, unsatisfactory given
Hogan's previous level of detail and realism. In some passages of the
book itself, the author proves that he knows more about
neurophysiology than he is willing to put into the story, at one point
citing the complex nature of both neuronal paths and biochemistry
involved in memory, but then conveniently ignoring that complication.
Given multiple personalities, the task of making one, or all,
sympathetic enough to engage the reader is difficult. It may, then,
be no wonder that Hogan fails. Very few of the characters in the book
are attractive, and those few seem to be relegated to bit parts. By
the end of the book it was very hard to care about how any of them
came out. (And I felt that two of them who showed a lot of promise
were very hard done by.)
The trade mark magic, card-sharping, and mentalist tricks that are
part and parcel of Hogan's "careful, you can be fooled" thesis show
up, but only in passing, at the level of parlour games.
And this leads to the biggest disappointment of all. A number of
Hogan's other works have pointed out how people are fooled, and very
carefully teach how the illusions are constructed, and how to test
them for validity. This book simply rails against government
intervention, conservationism, political correctness, and health fads.
Rather than illustrating logical flaws, the discussions in the book
degenerate into "yes it is/no it isn't" arguments. The result is that
whenever the story gets close to a political or social analysis, it
takes on a bad-tempered, right-wing pamphleteering tone, quite
reminiscent of the worst of Ayn Rand.
Other than that, it's fairly mundane.
copyright Robert M. Slade, 1999
Add my review for The Multiplex Man