The Virtual Bookcase Reviews of 'The Invisible Computer: Why Good Products Can Fail, the Personal Computer Is So Complex, and Information Appliances Are the Solution':
Reviewer amazon.com wrote:Currently, computer users must navigate a sea of guidebooks, frequently asked questions (FAQs), and wizards to perform a task such as searching the Web or creating a spreadsheet. While Donald Norman acknowledges that the personal computer allows for "flexibility and power," he also makes its limitations perfectly clear. "The personal computer is perhaps the most frustrating technology ever," he writes. "It should be quiet, invisible, unobtrusive." His vision is that of the "information appliance," digital tools created to answer our specific needs, yet interconnected to allow communication between devices. His solution? "Design the tool to fit so well that the tool becomes a part of the task." He proposes using the PC as the infrastructure for devices hidden in walls, in car dashboards, and held in the palm of the hand. A word of caution: some of Norman's zealotry leads to a certain creepiness (global positioning body implants) and goofiness (electric-power-generating plants in shoes). His message, though, is reasonably situated in the concept that the tools should bend to fit us and our goals: we sit down to write, not to word process; to balance bank accounts, not to fill in cells on a spreadsheet. In evenly measuring out the future of humanity's technological needs--and the limitations of the PC's current incarnation--Norman presents a formidable argument for a renaissance of the information appliance.
Reviewer Rob Slade wrote:
The subtitle for this book is just a little too long to include in the
publication data. It runs "Why Good Products Can Fail, the Personal
Computer Is So Complex, and Information Appliances Are the Solution."
As to the first part, Norman tends to imply products that fail aren't
all that good. As to the second, the book has a few suggestions, but
nothing really solid. As to the third, well, yes, this volume does
extol the virtues of the information appliance, but doesn't do well at
defining what it is, or why it will solve all our problems.
It is ironic that Norman is so insistent upon the fact that Edison was
such a disaster as a businessman that the term "phonograph" is hardly
ever used today. Ironic, because when chapter one finally does get
around to explaining the mistakes made (and, when it finally does, it
does a good job) the company used as a comparison is the Victor
Talking Machine Company, and Norman notes that "victrola" became the
generic term for a music playback machine for quite some time. True,
there are no more Edison machines on the market (outside of antique
stores) while the Victor successor RCA does have a place on the
shelves at Joe's Stereo Barn, but while everyone reading this column
knows what a phonograph is, it is only the erudite few who are
congratulating themselves on remembering what a victrola is. The real
message of chapter one seems to be the everything is confusing;
business is confusing, marketing is confusing, technology is
confusing, and PCs are confusing. This is not a solid thesis on which
to build a book.
Chapter two reviews the standard "life cycle" model of technology, as
well as a "product-promotion-market" view of business. Nothing new is
added to these old workhorse analogies and, in fact, the supporting
anecdotes weaken as much as strengthen the correspondence to reality.
The information appliance is introduced in chapter three. However,
the author seems to have failed to note some important material that
he includes. The definition of "appliance" indicates specificity: the
appliance is designed to perform a demarcated task. On the following
page the concept is illustrated by two such appliances, a digital
camera, and a business calculator, both of which perform their
assigned tasks more easily (from the user's perspective) than could a
computer. However, the cutline states that appliances can share data
with other devices. I defy anyone to get these two to share anything
in a meaningful way. Norman ends the chapter by outlining
"versatility" as a design criteria for an information appliance, and
therefore enters the fuzzy realm of wanting to have it all. The text
then turns to attacking the personal computer in chapter four. The
PC's crime? it is too versatile, and is, therefore, complex to use.
Chapter five examines new and coming technologies such as large scale
programs, more advanced interfaces, speech recognition, agent
technology, and network computers, and finds them all wanting. There
is no magic bullet to fix the problems of technology. Except
information appliances, of course. But Norman's argument starts with
a very telling illustration. He insists that technology need not be
complicated. There are some things that are complicated, such as the
theory of general relativity, but one does not need to know about
relativity to deal with physical objects. We will assume, of course,
that Norman is referring to physical objects of medium mass and low
velocity. Or, we will take Norman at his word and note that he does
not know anything about relativity. The point being that Newtonian
mechanics, like information appliances, may be fine for the bulk of
what we want to do. Sometimes, however, you will need something else.
And it is generally (relatively?) those times that make life
interesting.
Chapter six talks about infrastructure. And economics, metaphysics,
cameras, and email. From these points it arises that the proper
infrastructure must be designed the right way, must have the right
features, must be flexible to adapt to new needs, and must be
universal. As the last sentence of the chapter notes, "[i]f only."
Chapter seven notes that people are not like machines. Having started
by misquoting (yet again) poor patent Commissioner Duell, the fact
that devices are sometimes poorly designed is noted in chapter eight.
If you are designing for people, chapter nine states, you should pay
attention to people. (Another irony: Norman lauds the "glass cockpit"
for simplifying flight, without noting that the simplicity comes at a
cost of increased complexity when one needs to recall which menu and
screen brings up data from a dial that is no longer displayed by
default.) Chapter ten tells us that the current business structure is
all wrong. All great ideas initially dismissed, says chapter eleven,
thus protecting the book from any and all criticism. Chapter twelve
discusses all kinds of different technologies and I'm not quite sure
what they have to do with appliances.
An appendix finally delivers some ideas of what information appliances
might actually be. Unfortunately, most of the examples rely on
significant advances in technology (a $900, 250 gram device is rather
ridiculous as a memory aid for shopping, although a $50, twenty gram
appliance might have considerable sales) or are current contraptions
that have no relation to the PCs that Norman attacks so viciously.
Everyone is familiar with embedded computers, and as processing power
gets cheaper and smaller, more and more objects will get added
"intelligence."
I can sympathize with many of Norman's points about information
processing devices. This review was written using WordPerfect 4.2
because for my relatively simple purposes I do not need all the bells
and whistles of WordPerfect 8, and the 4.2 version, from a time of
simple monospaced fonts, is actually more suitable to the production
of a piece that will primarily be read online than the desktop
publishing oriented defaults of release 8. (I certainly do not need
to argue with a program that thinks it knows what I want to do better
than I know myself, such as Microsoft Word 97.) Information
appliances will undoubtedly have a majority of uses for those tasks we
currently assign to PCs. After all, a pre-printed fax cover sheet is
"easier" to use for that purpose than a piece of paper. But it will
take significant time, and more advice than we have here, to find out
what those appliances will be.
As a talking piece to promote the idea of the information appliance,
the book may work. It is hard to say that it will succeed, since a
lack of detail will not appeal to technical readers. On the other
hand, Norman's persistent antipathy to techies would imply that he
expects someone else to come up with the necessary machinery. Who
that might be is left open as well.
copyright Robert M. Slade, 1998
Add my review for The Invisible Computer: Why Good Products Can Fail, the Personal Computer Is So Complex, and Information Appliances Are the Solution