The Virtual Bookcase Reviews of 'The Faq Manual of Style':
Reviewer amazon.com wrote:Now this is a great idea! A guide for those charged with developing or maintaining Frequently Asked Questions files for their Internet site or discussion group. Because it's not as easy as it looks, and every time you miss the mark you end up fielding a dozen more of the same questions in email each week. Russell Shaw takes you through the process of determining how and when to develop your FAQ and determining that it'll do the job you want done. Loaded with examples, insights and plain good advice, this book can be a godsend for the overworked FAQmaker.
Reviewer Rob Slade wrote:
The net is doubling in population every year. That means every second person
on the net has been there less than a year. Some newcomers aren't too thrilled
with the net, but most are enthralled with the ability to find, and interact
with, groups of people discussing a common interest, however arcane your
interests may be.
Given the wealth of "newbies" entering the Internet all the time, existing
discussion groups get flooded with questions. The *same* questions. Time
after time after time. Questions, in other words, that get asked frequently.
Hence FAQs, or lists of Frequently Asked Questions, with the attendant answers.
The original FAQs were spawned in an attempt to reduce the bandwidth consumed
(and annoyance generated) by these endless questions. FAQs quickly became
reference materials in and of themselves, as well as fulfilling their initial
role of educating novices. The writing and maintenance of a FAQ can be a
significant chore. I participate in one FAQ maintained by committee,
contribute to a few others, and maintain one of my own.
Recently, however, the FAQ format has been used to produce different types of
documents. These newer FAQs tend to be more commercially oriented, being used
to introduce a company or product, or to serve in place of technical
documentation. It is these pseudo-FAQs that Shaw is primarily interested in.
The book does provide some common sense advice that those not long familiar
with the net could easily miss. There are suggestions on advertising,
marketing, and the restriction of documents to a "user-friendly" size. Shaw
does touch on the more traditional documents (which he refers to as "Newsgroup"
FAQs). His advice there, however, is quite limited. As an example, the
biggest problem facing a FAQ maintainer is deciding what to include. Shaw's
answer? This is "a judgement call based almost entirely on instinct and
experience."
copyright Robert M. Slade, 1996
Add my review for The Faq Manual of Style